WeSearch

188,000 Show HN posts, 14 years of data: what predicts GitHub stars

Daniel King· ·7 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 23 views
#technology#data analysis#github
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

A recent analysis of 188,000 Show HN posts over 14 years reveals insights into what predicts GitHub stars. The median Show HN score is 2 points, with a significant correlation between HN scores and GitHub stars. Posting on Monday at 00:00 UTC offers the best chance of achieving a high score.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.

Original article
Daniel King · Daniel King
Read full at Daniel King →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherDaniel King
Canonical URLhttps://danfking.github.io/blog/2026/04/23/show-hn-by-the-numbers/
Publication timeMon, 18 May 2026 00:04:26 +0000
Retrieval time2026-05-18T00:33:21.159Z
Last seen2026-05-18T00:33:21.159Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterTmAtu2fPDk3l
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Show HN by the Numbers: 188,000 Posts, 14 Years of Data, and What Actually Predicts GitHub Stars 23 April, 2026 Does it actually matter when you post your Show HN? And does a front-page run translate into GitHub stars? I scraped 188,085 Show HN posts and cross-referenced the top 500 with their GitHub star histories to find out. TL;AI The median Show HN scores 2 points. If you hit 50, you’re in the top 6%. Best posting time: Monday 00:00 UTC (Sunday 7pm Eastern), with a 10.8% chance of scoring 50+. Each HN upvote converts to roughly 1.4 GitHub stars within 48 hours. The half-life of a Show HN is 24 hours. After 48h, 92% of the star impact is over. Show HN volume has nearly tripled since 2019 (28,000 posts in 2025). Your post now competes with ~200 others per day.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Daniel King.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Daniel King