A $22.5M teardown Montauk ‘shack’ has a rare oceanfront perch — and Robert De Niro as a neighbor
Jennifer Gould Celebrity Real Estate exclusive gimme shelter A $22.5M teardown Montauk ‘shack’ has a rare oceanfront perch — and Robert De Niro as a neighbor By Jennifer Gould Published July 14, 2026, 11:16 a.m. Add The New York Post on Google An oceanfront Montauk property next to Robert De Niro’s estate has listed for $22.5 million, Gimme Shelter has learned. That money buys a “teardown” — an 1,800-square-foot “shack” built in 1960 — and sits on 1.1 acres, said listing broker Kyle Rosko, of Douglas Elliman.
- ▪Jennifer Gould Celebrity Real Estate exclusive gimme shelter A $22.5M teardown Montauk ‘shack’ has a rare oceanfront perch — and Robert De Niro as a neighbor By Jennifer Gould Published July 14, 2026, 11:16 a.m.
- ▪Add The New York Post on Google An oceanfront Montauk property next to Robert De Niro’s estate has listed for $22.5 million, Gimme Shelter has learned.
- ▪That money buys a “teardown” — an 1,800-square-foot “shack” built in 1960 — and sits on 1.1 acres, said listing broker Kyle Rosko, of Douglas Elliman.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Jennifer Gould Celebrity Real Estate exclusive gimme shelter A $22.5M teardown Montauk ‘shack’ has a rare oceanfront perch — and Robert De Niro as a neighbor By Jennifer Gould Published July 14, 2026, 11:16 a.m. ET (function() { var overlay = document.getElementById("nyp-player-lcp-overlay"); if (!overlay) { return; } function hideOverlay() { overlay.remove(); } function afterDCL() { requestAnimationFrame(hideOverlay); } if (document.readyState === "loading") { document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", afterDCL, { once: true }); } else { afterDCL(); } })(); See more of our coverage in your search results. Add The New York Post on Google An oceanfront Montauk property next to Robert De Niro’s estate has listed for $22.5 million, Gimme Shelter has learned.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from New York Post
