WeSearch
A computer scientist-novelist reflects on AI and our understanding of maths

A computer scientist-novelist reflects on AI and our understanding of maths

Anil Menon· ·8 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 14 views
More from Scroll.in ai Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

artificial intelligence How AI could influence our understanding of mathematics: A computer scientist-novelist’s reflections Perhaps the new age of mathematics will favour a mind that delights in speculation, leaps of the imagination and a deep sense of aesthetics. “The question of whether smooth three-dimensional fluid motion can break down has remained unresolved for roughly 90 years,” Open AI said. It put 10,000 AI agents to work on it and the task took 88 hours.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 5,786 of its stories.

Original article
Scroll.in · Anil Menon
Read full at Scroll.in →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherScroll.in
Canonical URLhttps://scroll.in/article/1095809/how-ai-could-influence-our-understanding-of-mathematics-a-computer-scientist-novelists-reflections
Publication timeMon, 21 Sep 2026 06:17:26 +0000
Retrieval time2026-09-21T06:33:47.617Z
Last seen2026-09-21T06:33:47.617Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterHZSd257gNdLy · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

artificial intelligence How AI could influence our understanding of mathematics: A computer scientist-novelist’s reflections Perhaps the new age of mathematics will favour a mind that delights in speculation, leaps of the imagination and a deep sense of aesthetics. Anil Menon Yesterday · 08:00 am Share Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on BlueSky Share on Threads Share on Reddit Copy Link Email Print Add Scroll on Google iOS App Android App Geralt/Pixabay [Licensed under CC0 Creative Commons] On September 8, OpenAI claimed it had solved the Navier-Stokes problem. “The question of whether smooth three-dimensional fluid motion can break down has remained unresolved for roughly 90 years,” Open AI said. It put 10,000 AI agents to work on it and the task took 88 hours.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Scroll.in.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Scroll.in