WeSearch

A corrupted linked list caused .NET createdump to consume 100% CPU forever

Ruwanpurage Pawan Ranasinghe· ·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 35 views
#dotnet#linux#crashdump#debugging#software
A corrupted linked list caused .NET createdump to consume 100% CPU forever
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

A corrupted linked list in the .NET createdump tool caused it to enter an infinite loop, resulting in 100% CPU usage. This issue was traced back to a missing safety assumption regarding the link_map structure during crash handling. An upstream fix has been implemented to prevent such infinite loops in the future.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (Newest) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 5,306 of its stories.

Original article
Hacker News (Newest) · Ruwanpurage Pawan Ranasinghe
Read full at Hacker News (Newest) →
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherHacker News (Newest)
Canonical URLhttps://ruwanpurage.substack.com/p/a-corrupted-linked-list-caused-net
Publication timeFri, 29 May 2026 04:46:58 +0000
Retrieval time2026-05-29T04:59:41.898Z
Last seen2026-05-29T04:59:41.898Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterydVFUcMIFjwi
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

A corrupted linked list caused .NET createdump to consume 100% CPU foreverI triggered a 100% CPU infinite loop in .NET createdump — and it got fixed upstreamRuwanpurage Pawan RanasingheMay 29, 2026ShareA few days ago, I was debugging a Linux process that behaved unexpectedly during crash handling.Thanks for reading Ruwanpurage's Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.SubscribeInstead of producing a crash dump, the process entered a state where CPU usage remained pinned at 100%, and the dump generation never completed.That investigation led into the internals of the .NET runtime’s Linux crash tool: createdump.The result was a reproducible infinite traversal condition in ELF loader enumeration logic, later confirmed and fixed in the upstream dotnet/runtime…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Hacker News (Newest).

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments