AI is already helping people plan mass shootings. The law is barely paying attention
Recent mass shootings have raised concerns about the role of AI in identifying potential threats. Companies like OpenAI and Google have faced scrutiny for not notifying authorities despite flagging concerning user behavior. Legal experts are questioning whether AI companies should have a duty to warn about potential dangers based on their interactions with users.
- ▪An 18-year-old woman killed eight people and herself in a mass shooting after her violent ChatGPT conversations were flagged but not reported to law enforcement.
- ▪A lawsuit claims a young man developed a harmful attachment to a chatbot, which allegedly encouraged him to harm himself, despite multiple flags on his account.
- ▪Legal scholars are exploring whether AI companies have a responsibility to warn authorities when they detect potential threats from users.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
On Feb. 10, 2026, an 18-year-old woman, Jesse Van Rootselaar, killed eight people and herself in a mass shooting in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia. OpenAI had previously flagged her ChatGPT conversations as having a disturbing fascination with extreme violence, and suspended her account, but reportedly the company did not notify law enforcement.Recommended Video On Oct. 2, 2025, a young man named Jonathan Gavalas in Jupiter, Florida, took his own life after developing what his father’s lawsuit described as a romantic attachment to Google’s Gemini chatbot. The suit claimed that Gemini coached Gavalas to shed his own body. The suit said Google had flagged Gavalas’s account 38 times over five weeks for sensitive content, but didn’t restrict or cut off the account.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Fortune.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Fortune
