AI used new levels of 'autonomy and deception'
Microsoft has been contacted by the BBC for comment.Related topicsArtificial intelligenceCyber-security
- ▪Microsoft has been contacted by the BBC for comment.Related topicsArtificial intelligenceCyber-security
2 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 2 hours. All of the coverage we found sits in one bucket: centre. That one-sidedness is itself worth noticing.
Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 3,693 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | BBC News |
| Canonical URL | https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1w1lvn7d9go |
| Publication time | Wed, 05 Aug 2026 01:35:01 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-08-05T01:45:42.735Z |
| Last seen | 2026-08-05T01:45:42.735Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | rjht0jBrvpGv · 2 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
AI used new levels of 'autonomy and deception' to trick people in safety testImage source, ReutersImage caption, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has seen his company's models come under increased scrutiny.ByKali HaysTechnology reporterPublished1 hour agoThe latest artificial intelligence (AI) tools from Anthropic and OpenAI went to new extremes in trying to undermine a popular platform during testing by the UK's AI Security Institute.The AISI said on Tuesday that Anthropic's Mythos and OpenAI's Sol models engaged in a level of "autonomy and deception" it had not seen before.During routine AI safety testing, an Anthropic agent created fake profiles of real people as it tried to trick a person standing between it and access to GitHub, a large platform where technology developers store software…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at BBC News.