WeSearch

AI Visibility Evidence Model: Five Factors, Graded by Evidence

Stefan Petschinka· ·1 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 2 views
#ai#search#technology#evidence#model
AI Visibility Evidence Model: Five Factors, Graded by Evidence
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The article introduces the AI Visibility Evidence (AEO) model, which grades five evidence-based factors. It describes a Machine First architecture that includes entity resolution, signal extraction, corroboration, and answer construction. The piece also differentiates AEO from SEO 2.0 by emphasizing a two‑stage retrieval and synthesis process.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 3,136 of its stories.

Original article
richresults.ai · Stefan Petschinka
Read full at richresults.ai →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherrichresults.ai
Canonical URLhttps://www.richresults.ai/evidence.html
Publication timeSat, 01 Aug 2026 00:56:35 +0000
Retrieval time2026-08-01T01:08:44.516Z
Last seen2026-08-01T01:08:44.516Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterYVU9OyZ5z_LA · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Machine First: the architecture the evidence points to. Machine First: Why AEO Is Not SEO 2.0 describes the structural approach behind AEO: entity resolution, signal extraction, corroboration and answer construction, including the two-stage logic of retrieval and synthesis that this model grades. Read the article →

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at richresults.ai.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from richresults.ai