WeSearch

Alberta won’t retaliate against U.S. with alcohol ban, Danielle Smith says

·1 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 5 views
#alberta#retaliate#against#alcohol#danielle
Alberta won’t retaliate against U.S. with alcohol ban, Danielle Smith says
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

Open this photo in gallery:Alberta Premier Danielle Smith provides an update in Calgary on Wednesday.Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian PressShareSave for laterPlease log in to bookmark this story.Log InCreate Free AccountAlberta Premier Danielle Smith says she does not plan to retaliate against U.S.

Key facts
How this story was covered

2 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 1 hour. All of the coverage we found sits in one bucket: centre. That one-sidedness is itself worth noticing.

Centre · 1
About this source

The Globe and Mail publishes from Canada and files mainly under world. We currently carry 1,769 of its stories.

Original article
The Globe and Mail
Read full at The Globe and Mail →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Open this photo in gallery:Alberta Premier Danielle Smith provides an update in Calgary on Wednesday.Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian PressShareSave for laterPlease log in to bookmark this story.Log InCreate Free AccountAlberta Premier Danielle Smith says she does not plan to retaliate against U.S. President Donald Trump’s threat of a 50 per cent tariff on Canadian goods with an alcohol ban.She told her call-in radio show a ban is an extraordinary measure, and she is leaving it up to retailers and consumers to decide how to stock their shelves and whether to drink American products with the looming tariffs.How Canadian alcohol producers are adjusting in light of Trump’s threatened tariffsSeveral Canadian provincial liquor boards stopped purchasing American alcohol last year in response to…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Globe and Mail.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from The Globe and Mail