Allahabad High Court says husband cannot take advantage of his wrongdoing in maintenance case
In this case, the parties allegedly married on December 12, 2016. The husband's first marriage, solemnised on February 29, 2008, came to be dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent only on November 15, 2017. Hence, the court found no illegality in the family court's finding that the husband had fraudulently concealed his subsisting marriage and that the woman had no knowledge of it.MaintenanceAllahabad High CourtMarriageGet the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country.
- ▪In this case, the parties allegedly married on December 12, 2016.
- ▪The husband's first marriage, solemnised on February 29, 2008, came to be dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent only on November 15, 2017.
- ▪Hence, the court found no illegality in the family court's finding that the husband had fraudulently concealed his subsisting marriage and that the woman had no knowledge of it.MaintenanceAllahabad High CourtMarriageGet the latest India New
Hindustan Times — Top publishes from India and files mainly under world. We currently carry 1,825 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Hindustan Times — Top |
| Canonical URL | https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/allahabad-high-court-says-husband-cannot-take-advantage-of-his-wrongdoing-in-maintenance-case-101785205872285.html |
| Publication time | Tue, 28 Jul 2026 09:04:56 +0530 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-07-28T04:22:53.054Z |
| Last seen | 2026-07-28T04:22:53.054Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | 9fUM_nfJB0xu · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Allahabad High Court says husband cannot take advantage of his wrongdoing in maintenance caseThe Allahabad High Court held that a woman who is induced into marriage by concealment of her husband's existing marriage is entitled to maintenance.Published on: Jul 28, 2026, 09:04:56 ISTPTIPrefer HTon GoogleShare viaCopy link The Allahabad High Court has held that a woman who is induced into marriage by concealment of her husband's existing marriage is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even though the marriage between the parties is void.Justice Prashad rejected the husband's contention that the woman could not be granted maintenance merely because the marriage was void.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Hindustan Times — Top.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Hindustan Times — Top
