WeSearch

Analyzing Indictment of James Comey for "86 47" Post

·6 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 2 views
#free speech#first amendment#true threats#james comey#political speech
Analyzing Indictment of James Comey for "86 47" Post
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted for a now-deleted Instagram post showing seashells arranged as '86 47,' which prosecutors allege constitutes a threat against President Trump, the 47th president. The indictment charges Comey with violating federal laws prohibiting threats against the president and interstate threats. Legal analyst Eugene Volokh argues the prosecution is unjustified, asserting the phrase '86' is a common idiom meaning removal or rejection, not a violent threat. He contends the post falls under protected political speech under the First Amendment, citing Supreme Court precedents that distinguish hyperbole and political rhetoric from true threats.

Original article
Reason.com
Read full at Reason.com →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Free Speech Analyzing Indictment of James Comey for "86 47" Post Eugene Volokh | 4.28.2026 5:39 PM <img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-8379830" src="https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/q60/uploads/2026/04/Comey8647Post.jpg" alt="" width="527" height="801" srcset="https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/q60/uploads/2026/04/Comey8647Post.jpg 527w, https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/q60/uploads/2026/04/Comey8647Post-197x300.jpg 197w" sizes="(max-width: 527px) 100vw, 527px" />Now-deleted Comey post, copied from a CNN article on the indictment.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Reason.com.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Reason.com