Appeals court hands Trump administration mail-in voting setback ahead of midterm elections
President Donald Trump was handed a setback in his quest to alter mail-in voting policy in federal elections on Saturday by a federal appeals court.The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston declined to lift an injunction blocking key provisions of a March executive order that sought to alter rules around mail-in ballots ahead of November’s midterm elections. District Judge Indira Talwani had ruled in late June that several parts of the order were unconstitutional after 23 Democratic states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration.
- ▪President Donald Trump was handed a setback in his quest to alter mail-in voting policy in federal elections on Saturday by a federal appeals court.The 1st U.S.
- ▪Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston declined to lift an injunction blocking key provisions of a March executive order that sought to alter rules around mail-in ballots ahead of November’s midterm elections.
- ▪District Judge Indira Talwani had ruled in late June that several parts of the order were unconstitutional after 23 Democratic states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration.
2 outlets in our directory ran this story. All of the coverage we found sits in one bucket: right. That one-sidedness is itself worth noticing.
- ▪ Federal appeals court rejects Trump bid to enforce mail ballot order ahead of midterm elections — Latest & Breaking News on Fox News
Washington Examiner files mainly under politics. We currently carry 2,028 of its stories.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
President Donald Trump was handed a setback in his quest to alter mail-in voting policy in federal elections on Saturday by a federal appeals court.The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston declined to lift an injunction blocking key provisions of a March executive order that sought to alter rules around mail-in ballots ahead of November’s midterm elections. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani had ruled in late June that several parts of the order were unconstitutional after 23 Democratic states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Washington Examiner.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Washington Examiner
