Bank of America agrees to $2.25M settlement in 7-Eleven ATM lawsuit — find out if you’re eligible for a payout
Bank of America has reached a $2.25 million settlement in a class-action lawsuit regarding ATM fees at 7-Eleven stores. The lawsuit accused the bank of overcharging customers for balance inquiries made at certain ATMs between 2018 and 2021. Customers eligible for a payout will be notified automatically if they still have an account, while those who closed their accounts must file a claim by July 29.
- ▪Bank of America agreed to pay $2.25 million to settle a class-action lawsuit over ATM fees.
- ▪The lawsuit alleged that customers were charged two fees for a single balance inquiry at 7-Eleven ATMs.
- ▪To qualify for a payout, customers must have had a Bank of America checking account and used the affected ATMs during the specified period.
New York Post files mainly under news. We currently carry 10,667 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | New York Post |
| Canonical URL | https://nypost.com/2026/05/18/business/bank-of-america-agrees-to-2-25m-settlement-in-7-eleven-atm-lawsuit-find-out-if-youre-eligible-for-a-payout/ |
| Publication time | Mon, 18 May 2026 11:07:38 -0400 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-18T15:09:56.611Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-18T15:09:56.611Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | IM0oXA_r46EM |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Business Bank of America agrees to $2.25M settlement in 7-Eleven ATM lawsuit — find out if you’re eligible for a payout By James Franey Published May 18, 2026, 11:07 a.m. ET See more of our coverage in your search results. Add The New York Post on Google Bank of America has agreed to pay $2.25 million to settle a class-action lawsuit accusing it of overcharging customers on ATM fees at 7-Eleven stores. The deal, announced this week, could put money in the pockets of thousands of checking-account holders who used certain ATMs between 2018 and 2021. No one has to prove wrongdoing — Bank of America denied any as part of the agreement — but the bank chose to settle rather than fight the case in court. 3 Bank of America agreed to settle the lawsuit but denied any wrongdoing.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from New York Post
