Boycotting Israel means cutting your nose to spite your face
The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement faces challenges as Israel's role in global innovation grows. Despite its aim to isolate Israel, the movement's premise is increasingly at odds with the reality of dependence on Israeli technology. As BDS gains traction in political and social spheres, its effectiveness and practical outcomes are called into question.
- ▪BDS has sought to isolate Israel through economic pressure and consumer boycotts for over two decades.
- ▪Israel is now integral to global industries such as cybersecurity and medicine, making a meaningful boycott nearly impossible.
- ▪The movement has gained visibility on college campuses and in political discussions, with figures like New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani supporting it.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
What does it actually mean to boycott Israel in 2026? For a movement dedicated to isolating the Jewish state, BDS faces a growing problem: Israel has become one of the world’s leading centers of innovation, helping power everything from cybersecurity and medicine to the technology millions rely on every day. From student government resolutions and campus demonstrations to social media campaigns and political races, the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, known as BDS, has positioned itself as a moral cause for a new generation.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Washington Examiner.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Washington Examiner
