Butler warns Coalition against using NDIS cuts as ‘pawn in bigger game’ and says bill delays could cost billions
Mark Butler has said a potential six-month extension for the NDIS inquiry could cost the federal budget billions of dollars. Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAPView image in fullscreenMark Butler has said a potential six-month extension for the NDIS inquiry could cost the federal budget billions of dollars.
- ▪Mark Butler has said a potential six-month extension for the NDIS inquiry could cost the federal budget billions of dollars.
- ▪Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAPView image in fullscreenMark Butler has said a potential six-month extension for the NDIS inquiry could cost the federal budget billions of dollars.
The Guardian — World publishes from United Kingdom and files mainly under world. We currently carry 2,426 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | the Guardian |
| Canonical URL | https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/jun/14/butler-warns-coalition-against-using-ndis-cuts-as-pawn-in-bigger-game-and-says-bill-delays-could-cost-billions |
| Publication time | Sun, 14 Jun 2026 03:24:41 GMT |
| Retrieval time | 2026-06-14T05:17:38.332Z |
| Last seen | 2026-06-14T05:18:35.117Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | 229F2WAPZH0V |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Mark Butler has said a potential six-month extension for the NDIS inquiry could cost the federal budget billions of dollars. Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAPView image in fullscreenMark Butler has said a potential six-month extension for the NDIS inquiry could cost the federal budget billions of dollars. Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAPNational disability insurance schemeButler warns Coalition against using NDIS cuts as ‘pawn in bigger game’ and says bill delays could cost billions Opposition and Greens could team up to extend inquiry into changes but health minister ‘utterly convinced’ federal government’s plan is right Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast Sarah Basford CanalesSat 13 Jun 2026 23.24 EDTLast modified on…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at the Guardian.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from the Guardian
