
CAREBench: Evaluating LLMs' Emotion Understanding by Assessing Cognitive Appraisal Reasoning
The article introduces CAREBench, a new benchmark designed to evaluate the emotion understanding capabilities of large language models (LLMs). It highlights the limitations of existing evaluation methods and proposes a process-level evaluation framework based on cognitive appraisal reasoning. The findings suggest that while some LLMs perform well in certain tasks, they struggle with understanding human emotional complexity.
- ▪CAREBench is the first benchmark with complete inferential chain annotations for evaluating LLMs' emotion understanding.
- ▪The study reveals that stronger models can match or exceed human performance in specific tasks but fall short in appraisal reasoning and positive emotion recognition.
- ▪Current LLMs have not fully internalized the cognitive mechanisms necessary to capture human emotional diversity.
arXiv cs.AI files mainly under ai research. We currently carry 1,128 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | arXiv cs.AI |
| Canonical URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17176 |
| Publication time | Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-19T04:04:57.272Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-19T04:04:57.272Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | er_ATCGnY4am |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2605.17176 (cs) [Submitted on 16 May 2026] Title:CAREBench: Evaluating LLMs' Emotion Understanding by Assessing Cognitive Appraisal Reasoning Authors:Zhaoyue Sun, Hainiu Xu, Andero Uusberg, James J. Gross, Petr Slovak, Yulan He View a PDF of the paper titled CAREBench: Evaluating LLMs' Emotion Understanding by Assessing Cognitive Appraisal Reasoning, by Zhaoyue Sun and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Emotion understanding is a core capability for LLMs to interact effectively with humans, yet existing evaluation paradigms rely on discrete emotion label prediction and fail to capture the cognitive processes underlying emotion generation.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at arXiv cs.AI.