WeSearch

ChatGPT is now refusing requests to write in famous authors' styles

Mariella Moon· ·1 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 5 views
#ai#copyright#openai#writing#law
ChatGPT is now refusing requests to write in famous authors' styles
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

ChatGPT has begun refusing requests to imitate the writing styles of both living and deceased authors. The change appears to be a precaution against potential copyright infringement claims, as the model now cites copyright concerns when asked to emulate specific authors. Tests confirm the chatbot still offers to produce original text with similar characteristics without directly copying the style.

Key facts
About this source

Engadget files mainly under tech. We currently carry 357 of its stories.

Original article
Engadget · Mariella Moon
Read full at Engadget →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherEngadget
Canonical URLhttps://www.engadget.com/2224867/chatgpt-refusing-to-write-in-famous-authors-styles/
Publication timeTue, 28 Jul 2026 09:05:25 +0000
Retrieval time2026-07-28T09:09:20.771Z
Last seen2026-07-28T09:09:20.771Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterH09CEqoVcPzL · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

News AI ChatGPT is now refusing requests to write in famous authors' styles Whether they're dead or alive. By Mariella Moon July 28, 2026 5:05 am EST Alexsl/Getty Images ChatGPT has been refusing to copy the voices and styles of popular authors, Ars Technica reports. Indeed, we have recently seen posts on social media about the chatbot not letting users mimic specific authors' writing anymore. Ars says the chatbot didn't comply with its prompts to imitate the styles of both living and dead authors during testing. That means OpenAI has recently changed how it deals with such requests, as a recent study by publication No Latency showed that ChatGPT didn't refuse them for dead authors. We tested it for ourselves and found Ars' observations consistent with our results.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Engadget.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Engadget