WeSearch

CogScale: Scalable Benchmark for Sequence Processing

·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 27 views
#artificial intelligence#machine learning#benchmarking
CogScale: Scalable Benchmark for Sequence Processing
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The paper introduces CogScale, a benchmark designed to evaluate the cognitive and memory abilities of various AI architectures. It presents 14 scalable synthetic tasks that allow researchers to test models efficiently without incurring high computational costs. The study evaluates seven different architectures, revealing that modern models perform better as task complexity increases.

Key facts
About this source

arXiv cs.AI files mainly under ai research. We currently carry 1,128 of its stories.

Original article
arXiv cs.AI
Read full at arXiv cs.AI →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherarXiv cs.AI
Canonical URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19758
Publication timeWed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400
Retrieval time2026-05-20T04:04:59.484Z
Last seen2026-05-20T04:04:59.484Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
Cluster3Nigc13tqcOi
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2605.19758 (cs) [Submitted on 19 May 2026] Title:CogScale: Scalable Benchmark for Sequence Processing Authors:Yannis Bendi-Ouis (Mnemosyne), Romain de Coudenhove (ENS-PSL), Xavier Hinaut (Mnemosyne) View a PDF of the paper titled CogScale: Scalable Benchmark for Sequence Processing, by Yannis Bendi-Ouis (Mnemosyne) and 2 other authors View PDF Abstract:The ability to maintain and manipulate information over time is a fundamental aspect of living beings and Artificial Intelligence. While modern models have achieved remarkable success in tasks like natural language processing, evaluating the capacity of novel architectures to process sequential information remains computationally expensive and time-consuming.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at arXiv cs.AI.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from arXiv cs.AI