WeSearch

Comment on Why AI Needs a “Genie Coefficient” by Weather

Bruce Schneier· ·9 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 2 views
#comment#needs#genie#coefficient#weather
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

Why AI Needs a “Genie Coefficient” This essay was written with Barath Raghavan, and originally appeared in IEEE Spectrum. None measure whether it does what you mean: the distance between what you ask an AI to do and the unspoken assumptions about how you want the AI to do it. We propose a new metric: the Genie coefficient.

Key facts
About this source

Schneier on Security » Comments Feed files mainly under news. We currently carry 3 of its stories.

Original article
Schneier on Security » Comments Feed · Bruce Schneier
Read full at Schneier on Security » Comments Feed →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Why AI Needs a “Genie Coefficient” This essay was written with Barath Raghavan, and originally appeared in IEEE Spectrum. Major benchmarks measure what AI can do. None measure whether it does what you mean: the distance between what you ask an AI to do and the unspoken assumptions about how you want the AI to do it. We propose a new metric: the Genie coefficient. There’s often a gap between one person’s request and another’s understanding. Most of the time, we bridge it using general knowledge. For example, if you ask a friend to get you coffee, they’ll pour a cup from the pot or buy one from a coffee shop. They won’t bring you a bag of raw beans or snatch a cup from a stranger and hand it to you. You never specified any of this. You never had to.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Schneier on Security » Comments Feed.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments