WeSearch
Compositional Literary Primitives in Instruction-Tuned LLMs: Cross-Architectural SAE Features for Self, Style, and Affect

Compositional Literary Primitives in Instruction-Tuned LLMs: Cross-Architectural SAE Features for Self, Style, and Affect

·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 37 views
More from arXiv cs.AI ai research Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The paper discusses a compositional architecture of literary primitives in instruction-tuned large language models. It identifies four feature classes that enhance emotional expression and stylistic modulation in the models Llama and Gemma. The study employs a validation pipeline to assess the models' performance in generating affect-categorizable outputs.

Key facts
About this source

arXiv cs.AI files mainly under ai research. We currently carry 1,128 of its stories.

Original article
arXiv cs.AI
Read full at arXiv cs.AI →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherarXiv cs.AI
Canonical URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18808
Publication timeWed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400
Retrieval time2026-05-20T04:04:59.484Z
Last seen2026-05-20T04:04:59.484Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterqWYdVnfd_iwl
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2605.18808 (cs) [Submitted on 11 May 2026] Title:Compositional Literary Primitives in Instruction-Tuned LLMs: Cross-Architectural SAE Features for Self, Style, and Affect Authors:Joao Paulo Cavalcante Presa, Savio Salvarino Teles de Oliveira View a PDF of the paper titled Compositional Literary Primitives in Instruction-Tuned LLMs: Cross-Architectural SAE Features for Self, Style, and Affect, by Joao Paulo Cavalcante Presa and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We characterize a compositional architecture of literary primitives in two instruction-tuned large language models (Llama 3.1 8B-Instruct and Gemma 2 9B-IT) via sparse autoencoders on mid-depth residual streams.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at arXiv cs.AI.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from arXiv cs.AI