WeSearch

Credit Assignment with Resets in Language Model Reasoning

·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 25 views
#artificial intelligence#reinforcement learning#language models
Credit Assignment with Resets in Language Model Reasoning
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The article discusses advancements in credit assignment methods for language model reasoning in reinforcement learning. It introduces two new techniques, Random-Reset Policy Optimization (RRPO) and Self-Reset Policy Optimization (SRPO), which aim to improve the precision of credit assignment. The authors demonstrate that SRPO consistently outperforms traditional methods by allowing the model to self-localize errors and learn from them effectively.

Key facts
About this source

arXiv cs.AI files mainly under ai research. We currently carry 1,128 of its stories.

Original article
arXiv cs.AI
Read full at arXiv cs.AI →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherarXiv cs.AI
Canonical URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25507
Publication timeTue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400
Retrieval time2026-05-26T04:07:43.013Z
Last seen2026-05-26T04:07:43.013Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
Clusterm2CU5C2h_-iR
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2605.25507 (cs) [Submitted on 25 May 2026] Title:Credit Assignment with Resets in Language Model Reasoning Authors:Ankur Samanta, Akshayaa Magesh, Ayush Jain, Youliang Yu, Daniel Jiang, Kavosh Asadi, Daniel Jiang, Kaveh Hassani, Paul Sajda, Jalaj Bhandari, Yonathan Efroni View a PDF of the paper titled Credit Assignment with Resets in Language Model Reasoning, by Ankur Samanta and 10 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Contemporary reinforcement learning with verifiable reward methods post-train language models on multi-step reasoning by assigning a single outcome reward uniformly across all tokens in a trajectory. Such uniform assignment ignores which steps contributed to success or failure.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at arXiv cs.AI.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from arXiv cs.AI