'Criminal education minister': Rahul Gandhi steps up attack on Dharmendra Pradhan
3 sources covered this · see comparison → ⚠ Left-only
“Dharmendra Pradhan is a criminal education minister. He is a symbol of the collapse of our education system. He has to go,” Gandhi said.Showing Sahil’s injuries to reporters, Gandhi said the government’s claim that pellet guns were not used was contradicted by the student’s condition.“The government has claimed that no pellet guns were used, but look at this.
- ▪“Dharmendra Pradhan is a criminal education minister.
- ▪He is a symbol of the collapse of our education system.
- ▪He has to go,” Gandhi said.Showing Sahil’s injuries to reporters, Gandhi said the government’s claim that pellet guns were not used was contradicted by the student’s condition.“The government has claimed that no pellet guns were used, but l
2 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 13 hours. All of the coverage we found sits in one bucket: lean left. That one-sidedness is itself worth noticing.
Hindustan Times — Top publishes from India and files mainly under world. We currently carry 1,580 of its stories.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
HomeNext'Criminal education minister': Rahul Gandhi steps up attack on Dharmendra PradhanGandhi also demanded action against security personnel accused of using pellet guns and batons against protesters.Published on: Jul 25, 2026, 07:29:46 ISTBy HT CorrespondentPrefer HTon GoogleShare viaCopy link Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi on Friday intensified his attack on Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan, calling him a “criminal education minister” and demanding his removal over exam paper leaks, as he presented before the media a student protester allegedly injured by a pellet gun during the July 20 protests in the capital.Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi with the man who allegedly suffered pellet gun injuries during students' protest.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Hindustan Times — Top.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Hindustan Times — Top
