WeSearch
CrowdSec Source Code Leak

CrowdSec Source Code Leak

·2 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 1 view
More from Crowdsec programming Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

CrowdSec BlogAnnouncementSep 17, 2026CrowdSec Statement: Source Code Exposure in May 2026 On September 16, CrowdSec was informed of a source code leak involving our GitHub repository, which occurred in May 2026. CrowdSec source code consists of two parts: a private one and another that hosts our Free Open Source Software (i.e., the Security Engine), which is public by design and therefore out of scope. The private part, though, contains the source code for our SaaS console, some AWS Cloud routines, some connectors, and automations.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (Front Page) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 1,764 of its stories. Top-voted stories on Hacker News.

Original article
Crowdsec
Read full at Crowdsec →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherCrowdsec
Canonical URLhttps://www.crowdsec.net/blog/crowdsec-statement-source-code-exposure
Publication timeThu, 17 Sep 2026 15:34:01 +0000
Retrieval time2026-09-17T16:13:44.272Z
Last seen2026-09-17T16:13:44.272Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusteruxfBpQC_FJkn · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

CrowdSec BlogAnnouncementSep 17, 2026CrowdSec Statement: Source Code Exposure in May 2026 On September 16, CrowdSec was informed of a source code leak involving our GitHub repository, which occurred in May 2026. Our team verified and confirmed the report. CrowdSec source code consists of two parts: a private one and another that hosts our Free Open Source Software (i.e., the Security Engine), which is public by design and therefore out of scope. The private part, though, contains the source code for our SaaS console, some AWS Cloud routines, some connectors, and automations. The news headline claiming 300 different repositories is accurate (when you include the 130+ public ones), though that number mostly reflects the code’s subdivision rather than a specific volume.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Crowdsec.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Crowdsec