WeSearch
Deep theorems were scarce and difficult and identified deep thought. AI broke it

Deep theorems were scarce and difficult and identified deep thought. AI broke it

·8 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 1 view
More from What's new ai Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The rather heated debate in many posts is relatively unusual for mathematics and has led to uncertainty and even some fear in the younger generation whether this will be detrimental for the subject of mathematics and their careers. Don’t listen to unfounded fear-mongering, the situation is much more pleasant, I would even say especially bright, if you are in mathematics today. But mathematics will change fundamentally, you may object.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 4,857 of its stories.

Original article
What's new
Read full at What's new →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherWhat's new
Canonical URLhttps://terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/09/13/deep-theorems-were-scarce-and-difficult-and-so-became-an-effective-mechanism-to-identify-deep-thought-ai-has-broken-this-system/
Publication timeMon, 14 Sep 2026 17:49:38 +0000
Retrieval time2026-09-14T17:56:51.398Z
Last seen2026-09-14T17:56:51.398Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterwMdVOODSXUjt · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

(Just discovered Professor Kra’s post today, very nice, and since I was writing a similar piece with the next generation of mathematicians in mind, I thought I would just copy my draft here, it might add some elements to the discussion). —- There has been significant discussion recently regarding announced breakthroughs on the Navier-Stokes equation using artificial intelligence (AI) assisted methods; a collection of thoughts has been collected/linked on this blog, where most likely you are also going to find more relevant links in the future. The rather heated debate in many posts is relatively unusual for mathematics and has led to uncertainty and even some fear in the younger generation whether this will be detrimental for the subject of mathematics and their careers.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at What's new.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from What's new