Defiant James Comey breaks silence on second criminal indictment: ‘Let’s go’
James Comey has responded defiantly to his second federal indictment, which alleges he threatened President Trump. In a video statement, he maintained his innocence and expressed confidence in the judiciary. The indictment is linked to an Instagram post featuring seashells arranged to form the numbers '86 47.'
- ▪James Comey was indicted for allegedly threatening to kill President Trump.
- ▪The indictment is based on an Instagram post showing seashells arranged to form the numbers '86 47.'
- ▪Comey's lawyer stated they will contest the charges in court.
2 outlets in our directory ran this story. All of the coverage we found sits in one bucket: lean left. That one-sidedness is itself worth noticing.
- ▪ Comey addresses second indictment: "I'm still innocent" — CBS News — Top
New York Post files mainly under news. We currently carry 10,523 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | New York Post |
| Canonical URL | https://nypost.com/2026/04/28/us-news/defiant-james-comey-breaks-silence-on-second-criminal-indictment/ |
| Publication time | Tue, 28 Apr 2026 18:30:45 -0400 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-04-28T22:31:54.193Z |
| Last seen | 2026-04-28T22:51:15.172Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | 8AsmBYrWSE4v · 2 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Politics Defiant James Comey breaks silence on second criminal indictment: ‘Let’s go’ By Josh Christenson Published April 28, 2026 Updated April 28, 2026, 7:28 p.m. ET Former FBI Director James Comey issued a defiant statement in response to his federal indictment Tuesday for allegedly threatening to kill President Trump. In a video statement published on his Substack, Comey said after an earlier indictment had been thrown out on procedural grounds that Trump’s Department of Justice was “back: This time about a picture of seashells on a North Carolina beach a year ago.” “And this won’t be the end of it. But nothing has changed with me. I’m still innocent. I’m still not afraid. And I still believe in the independent federal judiciary, so let’s go,” he added.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from New York Post
