WeSearch

Democratic senator says Trump speech likely to be more ‘election denialism’ from ‘world’s most famous sore loser’ – live

https://www.theguardian.com/profile/tom-ambrose,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/lucy-campbell,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/shrai-popat,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/robert-mackey,http· ·1 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 8 views
#democratic#senator#says#trump#speech
Democratic senator says Trump speech likely to be more ‘election denialism’ from ‘world’s most famous sore loser’ – live
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

19.14 EDTA new blog dawnsWe are wrapping up here and moving our live coverage of the second Trump administration to a fresh blog, focused on the president’s much anticipated primetime address, widely expected to concern the 2020 election he just can’t admit he lost. Rather than wait to react, Democratic lawmakers are getting their pre-bunks of Donald Trump’s expected claims about the 2020 election in ahead of time on social media. Maryland senator Angela Alsobrooks framed her comments in the style of a young person concerned about an elderly relative unable to let go of a favorite conspiracy theory.

Key facts
Original article
the Guardian · https://www.theguardian.com/profile/tom-ambrose,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/lucy-campbell,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/shrai-popat,https://www.theguardian.com/profile/robert-mackey,http
Read full at the Guardian →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

19.14 EDTA new blog dawnsWe are wrapping up here and moving our live coverage of the second Trump administration to a fresh blog, focused on the president’s much anticipated primetime address, widely expected to concern the 2020 election he just can’t admit he lost. Please join us there for updates and analysis before, during and after the speech.Here are the latest developments as we sign off here: Donald Trump’s wildly false claim that the CHIPS Act, a bipartisan law signed by his predecessor Joe Biden, required firms receiving funding to be run by transgender executives, baffled the law’s author, and set off a scramble to figure out where this entirely untrue claim came from.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at the Guardian.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from the Guardian