DHS finds 278,000 noncitizens registered to vote, Trump expected to reveal in primetime speech
US News exclusive DHS finds 278,000 noncitizens registered to vote, Trump expected to reveal in primetime speech By Caitlin Doornbos Published July 16, 2026, 10:22 p.m. Add The New York Post on Google President Trump is expected to reveal during his primetime speech Thursday on election security that at least 278,000 noncitizens are registered to vote in US federal elections. The shocking number is part of a forthcoming report by the Department of Homeland Security, a source familiar told The Post.
- ▪US News exclusive DHS finds 278,000 noncitizens registered to vote, Trump expected to reveal in primetime speech By Caitlin Doornbos Published July 16, 2026, 10:22 p.m.
- ▪Add The New York Post on Google President Trump is expected to reveal during his primetime speech Thursday on election security that at least 278,000 noncitizens are registered to vote in US federal elections.
- ▪The shocking number is part of a forthcoming report by the Department of Homeland Security, a source familiar told The Post.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
US News exclusive DHS finds 278,000 noncitizens registered to vote, Trump expected to reveal in primetime speech By Caitlin Doornbos Published July 16, 2026, 10:22 p.m. ET (function() { var overlay = document.getElementById("nyp-player-lcp-overlay"); if (!overlay) { return; } function hideOverlay() { overlay.remove(); } function afterDCL() { requestAnimationFrame(hideOverlay); } if (document.readyState === "loading") { document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", afterDCL, { once: true }); } else { afterDCL(); } })(); See more of our coverage in your search results. Add The New York Post on Google President Trump is expected to reveal during his primetime speech Thursday on election security that at least 278,000 noncitizens are registered to vote in US federal elections.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from New York Post
