Digital infrastructure company SWI raised €800M to upgrade its data centers, including some from Genesis Digital, a bitcoin miner snarled in FTX's bankruptcy (Alexander Osipovich/Wall Street Journal)
SWI, a digital infrastructure company, raised €800 million to upgrade its data centers, incorporating assets from Genesis Digital. Genesis Digital is a bitcoin miner that became entangled in the FTX bankruptcy. The investment highlights ongoing interest in crypto‑related infrastructure despite regulatory scrutiny.
- ▪SWI secured €800 million to modernize its data center portfolio.
- ▪The upgrades will include facilities previously owned by Genesis Digital.
- ▪Genesis Digital is a bitcoin mining operation linked to the FTX bankruptcy.
- ▪The funding reflects investor confidence in digital infrastructure for crypto services.
- ▪The move may position SWI to meet growing demand for cryptocurrency mining capacity.
Techmeme files mainly under tech. We currently carry 3,766 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Techmeme |
| Canonical URL | https://www.techmeme.com/261012/p11#a261012p11 |
| Publication time | Mon, 12 Oct 2026 05:55:01 -0400 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-10-12T09:56:02.406Z |
| Last seen | 2026-10-12T09:56:02.406Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | mhNy522_TmqK |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
About This Page This is a Techmeme archive page. It shows how the site appeared at 5:55 AM ET, October 12, 2026. The most current version of the site as always is available at our home page. To view an earlier snapshot click here and then modify the date indicated. From Mediagazer New York Times: The US DOJ confirms it is probing whether ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, and Fox violated antitrust law by briefly suspending White House pool coverage of President Trump Max Tani / Semafor: Sources detail how ABC News initially defended then retracted an article about President Trump's sons' defense links, saying it was published “prematurely” Nieman Lab: An analysis of 15 years of cable news transcripts finds Fox attacks the media every 14.5 minutes, MSNBC every 61 minutes, and CNN every 140 minutes
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Techmeme.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Techmeme
