WeSearch

Does a third-place game actually provide any consolation? It’s complicated

·1 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 4 views
#sports#worldcup#soccer#Mike Vaccaro#Kylian Mbappé#France#England#Lionel Messi#World Cup
Does a third-place game actually provide any consolation? It’s complicated
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The concept of a third-place game in sports is complicated and has been debated for years. The game is officially called the Third-Place Match, but it is often referred to as the consolation game, which can be misleading. The value and purpose of this game are questioned, as finishing in third place can be seen as a disappointment rather than a consolation.

Key facts
Original article
New York Post
Read full at New York Post →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

open mike Mike Vaccaro Does a third-place game actually provide any consolation? It’s complicated By Mike Vaccaro Published July 18, 2026, 6:16 p.m. ET France's Kylian Mbappé during the warm-up before the third-place match. REUTERS France and England played the penultimate match of the World Cup on Saturday afternoon, and so once again we are faced with the existential question: Whither the consolation game? We’ll start there. Officially this is called the “Third-Place Match,” and it may not sound like much, but for years in other sports it was called by its more colloquial name: the consolation game. This was always a little bit funny, because there’s really nothing at all consoling about these games.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from New York Post