Fourth Circuit Concludes South Carolina Cannot Limit "No-Excuse" Absentee Ballots to Those Over 65
Voting Rights Fourth Circuit Concludes South Carolina Cannot Limit "No-Excuse" Absentee Ballots to Those Over 65 An election law question that seems destined for the Supreme Court. Adler | 8.19.2026 11:34 AM Yesterday, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded that states cannot limit "no excuse" absentee voting to the elderly.
- ▪Voting Rights Fourth Circuit Concludes South Carolina Cannot Limit "No-Excuse" Absentee Ballots to Those Over 65 An election law question that seems destined for the Supreme Court.
- ▪Adler | 8.19.2026 11:34 AM Yesterday, a unanimous panel of the U.S.
- ▪Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded that states cannot limit "no excuse" absentee voting to the elderly.
Reason Magazine files mainly under politics. We currently carry 561 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Reason.com |
| Canonical URL | https://reason.com/volokh/2026/08/19/fourth-circuit-concludes-south-carolina-cannot-limit-no-excuse-absentee-ballots-to-those-over-65/ |
| Publication time | Wed, 19 Aug 2026 15:34:19 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-08-19T15:49:46.990Z |
| Last seen | 2026-08-19T15:49:46.990Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | None |
| Cluster logic | Not yet clustered, or no peer story found in the clustering window. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Voting Rights Fourth Circuit Concludes South Carolina Cannot Limit "No-Excuse" Absentee Ballots to Those Over 65 An election law question that seems destined for the Supreme Court. Jonathan H. Adler | 8.19.2026 11:34 AM Yesterday, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded that states cannot limit "no excuse" absentee voting to the elderly. Judge Gregory wrote for the panel in Grant v. Belangia, joined by Judges Harris and Richardson. His opinion begins: The Constitution grants states broad authority to regulate "[t]he Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections," U.S. Const. art. 1, § 4, including whether to permit absentee voting.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Reason.com.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Reason.com
