Games matter because games don't matter, says a philosopher
Philosopher C. Thi Nguyen argues that the value of games lies in their arbitrary scoring systems, which allow for freedom and creativity. In contrast, he critiques metrics-driven systems that disguise their arbitrary nature as legitimate, leading to oppressive outcomes. Nguyen encourages embracing diverse interests and stepping away from rigid networking mindsets.
- ▪C. Thi Nguyen's book, The Score, discusses the significance of arbitrary scoring in games.
- ▪Nguyen believes that good games allow players to walk away freely, unlike oppressive metrics in society.
- ▪David Runciman highlights the dual nature of games, where arbitrary rules can be both liberating and stifling.
Boing Boing files mainly under tech. We currently carry 317 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Boing Boing |
| Canonical URL | https://boingboing.net/2026/05/28/games-matter-because-games-dont-matter-says-a-philosopher.html |
| Publication time | Fri, 29 May 2026 00:22:13 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-29T00:54:38.877Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-29T00:54:38.877Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | 7u8FwUfJdMPG |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Games matter because games don't matter, says a philosopher Ellsworth Toohey 5:22 pm Thu May 28, 2026 In bridge, a heart trick earns 30 points while a club trick earns 20, numbers that mean nothing outside of the game. That's the whole point, argues philosopher C. Thi Nguyen in his book The Score. Good games use an arbitrary scoring system as a means to an end and never pretend the score means anything on its own. Nguyen's slogan: "Games matter because games don't matter." Bad games do the reverse. Credit scores, university league tables, and the clicks-and-minutes metrics that data harvesters chase all dress their arbitrary numbers up as legitimate, hide the seams, and trap you with the sunk-cost fallacy. A good game is voluntary and lets you walk away.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Boing Boing.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Boing Boing
