Genetic Testing for Kidney Disease Often Not Discussed
A recent survey revealed that most patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are not being informed about genetic testing options by their healthcare providers. Despite the existence of guidelines recommending such discussions, only 1 in 5 patients reported having conversations about genetic testing. Researchers emphasize the importance of increasing awareness and communication regarding genetic testing for kidney diseases among both providers and patients.
- ▪Only 1 in 5 patients with CKD reported discussions about genetic testing with their healthcare providers.
- ▪Between 20% and 30% of CKD cases have a genetic basis, which is often underrecognized.
- ▪Significant predictors for provider discussions included being younger than 50, male, and having private insurance.
Medscape files mainly under health. We currently carry 231 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Medscape |
| Canonical URL | https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/genetic-testing-kidney-disease-often-not-discussed-2026a1000hf6?src=rss |
| Publication time | Wed, 27 May 2026 05:12:06 EDT |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-27T09:37:57.389Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-27T09:37:57.389Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | h1g0SfpLL69q |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
New Orleans — Clinicians are not discussing genetic testing or counseling with the majority of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in whom such testing is indicated, a new survey found.Despite guidance published in Kidney International in 2020, and a 2024 report by the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) Genetic Testing Working Group, the survey showed that only 1 in 5 people with CKD in whom genetic testing was indicated reported that a healthcare provider had discussed either genetic testing or counseling with them.“This study highlights the need for more discussion between providers and their patients about genetic testing for kidney disease,” said Radhika Patel, MD, of the Center for Precision Medicine and Genomics at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, and…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Medscape.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Medscape
