WeSearch
Google AI Studio fakes data deletion. VRP auto-banned me in 60s for reporting it

Google AI Studio fakes data deletion. VRP auto-banned me in 60s for reporting it

Istokovicsgyorgy· ·2 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 8 views
More from Medium ai Compare coverage Trending Talk Blindspots Daily Sources Live wire
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

A user claims that Google AI Studio's permanent deletion feature is deceptive, as it only moves local files to trash rather than purging backend data. The user reports that their report to Google's Bug Hunter program resulted in an immediate automated account ban without human review. The individual has forwarded evidence of this alleged data retention flaw to CISA and European privacy watchdogs.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 5,681 of its stories.

Original article
Medium · Istokovicsgyorgy
Read full at Medium →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherMedium
Canonical URLhttps://medium.com/@istokovicsgyorgy79/google-ai-studio-fakes-data-deletion-vrp-auto-banned-me-in-60s-for-reporting-it-ea68e06f9bc2
Publication timeSun, 20 Sep 2026 04:39:12 +0000
Retrieval time2026-09-20T04:58:46.407Z
Last seen2026-09-20T04:58:46.407Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterACtFLda44PTq · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Google AI Studio fakes data deletion. VRP auto-banned me in 60s for reporting it.Istokovicsgyorgy2 min read·Just now--ListenSharePlease read the technical steps before commenting or flagging. This is a reproducible architectural flaw (CWE-459), and Google’s Bug Hunter program just permanently banned me without human review to cover it up.The Illusion of the “Delete” ButtonWhen you click “Delete permanently” in Google AI Studio, the UI explicitly warns you: “The item will be permanently deleted and cannot be recovered later. This action cannot be undone.”But that is a complete lie. The system does not send a deletion cascade to Google’s backend (Interactions API / Project Storage).

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Medium.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Medium