Google AI Studio fakes data deletion. VRP auto-banned me in 60s for reporting it
A user claims that Google AI Studio's permanent deletion feature is deceptive, as it only moves local files to trash rather than purging backend data. The user reports that their report to Google's Bug Hunter program resulted in an immediate automated account ban without human review. The individual has forwarded evidence of this alleged data retention flaw to CISA and European privacy watchdogs.
- ▪The user asserts that clicking 'Delete permanently' in Google AI Studio does not remove data from the backend but merely moves a local JSON file to Google Drive Trash.
- ▪According to the report, the user was permanently banned from the Google VRP program within one minute of submitting a ticket, which was closed as 'Intended Behavior'.
- ▪The user states that they have sent the forensic audit trail and evidence to CISA and the European privacy watchdog NOYB for potential GDPR violations.
- ▪The article describes the issue as a reproducible architectural flaw classified as CWE-459, where data can be recovered using standard Drive tools.
Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 5,681 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Medium |
| Canonical URL | https://medium.com/@istokovicsgyorgy79/google-ai-studio-fakes-data-deletion-vrp-auto-banned-me-in-60s-for-reporting-it-ea68e06f9bc2 |
| Publication time | Sun, 20 Sep 2026 04:39:12 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-09-20T04:58:46.407Z |
| Last seen | 2026-09-20T04:58:46.407Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | ACtFLda44PTq · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Google AI Studio fakes data deletion. VRP auto-banned me in 60s for reporting it.Istokovicsgyorgy2 min read·Just now--ListenSharePlease read the technical steps before commenting or flagging. This is a reproducible architectural flaw (CWE-459), and Google’s Bug Hunter program just permanently banned me without human review to cover it up.The Illusion of the “Delete” ButtonWhen you click “Delete permanently” in Google AI Studio, the UI explicitly warns you: “The item will be permanently deleted and cannot be recovered later. This action cannot be undone.”But that is a complete lie. The system does not send a deletion cascade to Google’s backend (Interactions API / Project Storage).
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Medium.