Google defends its Safari deal with Apple in antitrust ruling appeal
Google is appealing an antitrust ruling that found it maintained monopolies in search and advertising. The company argues that its deal with Apple for default search placement in Safari is a result of lawful competition. Google contends that the court made legal errors in its ruling and imposed unfair restrictions on its agreements with Apple.
- ▪In August 2024, the Department of Justice won an antitrust case against Google, labeling it a monopolist.
- ▪Google's deal with Apple involves paying 36% of search advertising revenue generated through Safari, amounting to around $20 billion in 2022.
- ▪The court allowed Google to continue paying Apple for default placement but imposed new limits, including a 12-month default limit.
9to5Mac files mainly under tech. We currently carry 338 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | 9to5Mac |
| Canonical URL | https://9to5mac.com/2026/05/22/google-defends-its-safari-deal-with-apple-in-antitrust-ruling-appeal/ |
| Publication time | Fri, 22 May 2026 22:58:33 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-22T23:02:03.354Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-22T23:02:03.354Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | od7LmZCCvum1 |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
// Make sure that nineto5ads exists, it will load ad once google tag exists window.nineto5ads = window.nineto5ads|| []; if (typeof adSizes === 'undefined') { var adSizes = {"leaderboard":{"mobile":[[320,50],[320,100]],"tablet":[[728,90],[320,100]],"desktop":[[970,250],[728,90],[970,70],[970,90]]},"sidebar":{"mobile":[300,250],"desktop":[[300,600],[300,250]]}}; } function getLeaderboardApstagSlotsSizes() { if ( window.innerWidth < 768 ) { return adSizes.leaderboard.mobile; } else if ( window.innerWidth < 1024 ) { return adSizes.leaderboard.tablet; } else { return adSizes.leaderboard.desktop; } } window.nineto5ads.push(function() { apstag.fetchBids({ slots: [{ slotID: "div-gpt-ad-1436850350386-0", slotName: "\/1049447\/9to5mac-Top", sizes: getLeaderboardApstagSlotsSizes() }], timeout: 2e3…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at 9to5Mac.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from 9to5Mac
