WeSearch

How Does Bayesian Causal Discovery Fail? Characterising Structural Consequences in Linear Gaussian Networks under Latent Confounding

·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 1 view
#artificial intelligence#causal inference#bayesian methods#latent confounding
How Does Bayesian Causal Discovery Fail? Characterising Structural Consequences in Linear Gaussian Networks under Latent Confounding
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The paper investigates how Bayesian causal discovery behaves when latent confounding is present in linear Gaussian networks. It identifies a correlation threshold that lowers with larger sample sizes, causing the posterior to favor spurious edges between confounded variables. The authors also describe two distinct failure regimes of the posterior and validate their analysis with exact computations on various graph structures.

Key facts
Original article
arXiv cs.AI
Read full at arXiv cs.AI →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2607.09449 (cs) [Submitted on 10 Jul 2026] Title:How Does Bayesian Causal Discovery Fail? Characterising Structural Consequences in Linear Gaussian Networks under Latent Confounding Authors:Debargha Ghosh, Silja Renooij, Anna Kononova View a PDF of the paper titled How Does Bayesian Causal Discovery Fail? Characterising Structural Consequences in Linear Gaussian Networks under Latent Confounding, by Debargha Ghosh and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Bayesian causal discovery is widely used for its ability to quantify epistemic uncertainty over directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) through posterior inference.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at arXiv cs.AI.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from arXiv cs.AI