How much are you spending on the Iran war? $300 and counting.
3 sources covered this
⚠ Left-only
compare →
Coverage diverges in framing the issue, with Mother Jones emphasizing the financial burden on taxpayers and the concept of an “unacknowledged tax.” In contrast, the New York Times focuses on Iran's strategic maneuvers in the conflict,…
·
0 reactions
·
0 comments
·
32 views
How this story was covered
3 outlets in our directory ran this story, first to last over 11 hours. Coverage spans 2 points on the political spectrum — 1 left, 1 lean left.
Left · 1Lean left · 1
- ▪ How Iran Gained Leverage in the War — NYT > Top Stories
- ▪ How Much Are You Spending On the Iran War? $300 and Counting. — Mother Jones
About this source
r/Economics files mainly under social. We currently carry 164 of its stories.
Original article
r/Economics
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | r/Economics |
| Canonical URL | https://www.reddit.com/r/Economics/comments/1thxek9/how_much_are_you_spending_on_the_iran_war_300_and/ |
| Publication time | 2026-05-19T19:23:17+00:00 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-19T19:34:57.939Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-19T19:35:01.336Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | none |
| Excerpt method | No excerpt available. |
| Summary | None yet |
| Summary source text | none |
| Citation coverage | No WeSearch summary has been generated for this story yet. |
| Cluster | K1B6nJhElDFF · 3 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Open original publisher →
Source rights JSON →
Machine-readable provenance →
Rights framework →
WESEARCH-STORY-PROVENANCE-V1
Anonymous · no account needed