How single-party primary elections are reshaping Congress
Single-party primary elections are contributing to increased polarization in Congress. Lawmakers are expressing concerns that these closed primaries limit voter choice and prioritize party loyalty over independent political judgment. Reform advocates argue that the current system is detrimental to democracy and hinders compromise among elected officials.
- ▪Closed primaries often exclude independent voters and lead to less participation than general elections.
- ▪More than 90% of U.S. House seats are now considered safe for one party, making primaries crucial in determining representatives.
- ▪Lawmakers like Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick argue that closed primaries discourage compromise and push moderate candidates out of the political landscape.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Deep Dive Elections How single-party primary elections are reshaping Congress May 30, 20265:00 AM ET By Eric McDaniel , Ashley Lopez "I Voted" stickers are seen as a person casts their ballot in Philadelphia in Pennsylvania's primary on May 19. Matthew Hatcher/Getty Images hide caption toggle caption Matthew Hatcher/Getty Images Stay up to date with our Politics newsletter, sent weekly. Congress could soon be more polarized than it already is. And primary elections are a big reason why. Some lawmakers have begun to speak out against closed, single-party primaries, which they see as part of a system that limits voter choice and incentivizes elected officials to prioritize party loyalty over their own political judgment. It's a case long made by advocates of primary reform.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at NPR — News.