How the ‘white supremacy culture framework’ subverts American values
During recent congressional testimony, the director of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History, Anthea Hartig, faced sharp questioning from Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) over internal museum documents that quickly went viral. Hartig was asked by Gill, “As part of this white supremacy document that your organization has promoted, objectivity is a core and defining aspect of white supremacy culture.
- ▪During recent congressional testimony, the director of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History, Anthea Hartig, faced sharp questioning from Rep.
- ▪Brandon Gill (R-TX) over internal museum documents that quickly went viral.
- ▪Hartig was asked by Gill, “As part of this white supremacy document that your organization has promoted, objectivity is a core and defining aspect of white supremacy culture.
Washington Examiner files mainly under politics. We currently carry 1,950 of its stories.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
During recent congressional testimony, the director of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History, Anthea Hartig, faced sharp questioning from Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) over internal museum documents that quickly went viral. Hartig was asked by Gill, “As part of this white supremacy document that your organization has promoted, objectivity is a core and defining aspect of white supremacy culture. Do you think that it’s the goal of the Smithsonian Institution to promote white supremacy culture?” Hartig, seemingly confused, asked Gill more about the document, and Gill responded, “This is part of the ‘MASS Action Toolkit’ that your organization has promoted for several years under your leadership.” Recommended Stories How the ‘white supremacy culture framework’ subverts American…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Washington Examiner.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Washington Examiner
