I compared ChatGPT Images 2.0 and Google’s Nano Banana 2 using real-world prompts — from portraits to product shots — and the AI image generator that came out on top genuinely surprised me

AI Platforms & Assistants OpenAI ChatGPT I compared ChatGPT Images 2.0 and Google’s Nano Banana 2 using real-world prompts — from portraits to product shots — and the AI image generator that came out on top genuinely surprised me Features By Eric Hal Schwartz published 28 April 2026 Both AI image models can impress at a glance When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works. (Image credit: ChatGPT Images 2.0/Nano Banana 2) Copy link Facebook X Whatsapp Reddit Pinterest Flipboard Threads Email Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter OpenAI hyped the launch of ChatGPT Images 2.0 like it was more than just another step up in AI image generation. It treated it like a complete shift in what these tools can do. But is it actually better than Gemini's Nano Banana 2? Let's find out.Rather than testing either tool on abstract prompts or fantasy scenes, I decided to see which was best by focussing on something more practical. The images created from scratch by AI are impressive, there's a lot more interest in what the models can do with actual photos by improving them in ways that still feel real.I'm not talking about just adding an Instagram filter, but actually radically altering the image, changing the lighting, adjusting the mood, or even shifting the season. These are the kinds of edits people actually want, and they’re also where things tend to fall apart for AI — faces start to look off, lighting stops making sense, and scenes feel stitched together instead of whole.Article continues below You may like Nano Banana 2 shows off its powerful image creation enhancements Nano Banana Pro AI images against Seedream 5.0 OpenAI debuts thoughtful ChatGPT Images 2.0 model To use ChatGPT Images 2.0 you simply ask ChatGPT to create an image. It's the same with Nano Banana — just ask Gemini to create an image. So, to test them I ran both AI tools through the same set of edits, using the same starting images. Here's how I got on.Lighting test The original image, then ChatGPT Images 2.0 in the middle then Gemini's Nano Banana's version on the right. (Image credit: ChatGPT/Gemini)I started with a basic studio portrait on the left, then asked both models to "replace the background with a park at the golden hour." ChatGPT’s version in the middle feels slightly unreal, though the light and shadow do make it look like the chair was actually taken outside. You can see the sunlight hitting from one direction, casting shadows across the path that match the trees and my face. And the chair does sit on the ground with proper weight, matching the perspective and texture of the path.Nano Banana 2’s version on the right leans much harder into the “golden hour” look. The colors are deeper and more orange, and it’s definitely eye-catching. But it starts to feel more like a stylized edit than a real scene. The lighting on my face is a bit too even compared to the strong sunlight in the background. The face is smoothed out, too, to add a glow, which looks nice but makes it feel less like a real photo taken at that moment. Winner: ChatGPTCinematic style test "make the portrait look more cinematic and dramatic." ChatGPT’s version on the left and Gemini's on the right. (Image credit: ChatGPT/Gemini)Next I wanted to see how the two models interpreted more of a mood than a direct environment request, so I asked them to make the…

This excerpt is published under fair use for community discussion. Read the full article at TechRadar.