I gave Gemini 3.5 Flash a CVE-fix PR to review. It found another bug in the same file.
Vicente Junior tested Google's Gemini 3.5 Flash model by submitting three production pull requests for code review. The model successfully identified legitimate bugs, including a second bug in addition to a known security vulnerability. This experiment demonstrated the model's effectiveness in analyzing code and providing structured feedback.
- ▪Gemini 3.5 Flash was tested on three real production pull requests.
- ▪The model identified three legitimate bugs and did not hallucinate any issues.
- ▪One of the identified bugs was related to a known security vulnerability in Fastify.
DEV.to (Top) files mainly under programming. We currently carry 4,924 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | DEV.to (Top) |
| Canonical URL | https://dev.to/vicente_junior_dev/i-gave-gemini-35-flash-a-cve-fix-pr-to-review-it-found-another-bug-in-the-same-file-1g24 |
| Publication time | Fri, 22 May 2026 22:40:14 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-22T23:02:03.354Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-22T23:02:03.354Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | QnR5BHFzhH8C |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3838257) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Vicente Junior Posted on May 22 I gave Gemini 3.5 Flash a CVE-fix PR to review. It found another bug in the same file. #devchallenge #googleiochallenge #ai #gemini Google I/O Writing Challenge Submission This is a submission for the Google I/O Writing Challenge Across 3 real production PRs, I asked Gemini 3.5 Flash to do a code review. The model — announced this week at Google I/O 2026 — caught 3 legitimate bugs, hallucinated 0, in roughly 4 seconds per PR.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from DEV.to (Top)
