I just watched Denzel Washington and John Travolta's action thriller remake and it really goes off the rails
This might be the most average action thriller ever made. Its most egregious sin of all is that, despite featuring Denzel Washington, John Travolta, John Turturro and James Gandolfini, it underutilizes most of them. The latter is a 1974 action thriller that's actually good.Now, to be fair to this remake, it's not bad.
- ▪This might be the most average action thriller ever made.
- ▪Its most egregious sin of all is that, despite featuring Denzel Washington, John Travolta, John Turturro and James Gandolfini, it underutilizes most of them.
- ▪The latter is a 1974 action thriller that's actually good.Now, to be fair to this remake, it's not bad.
Tom's Guide files mainly under tech. We currently carry 1,703 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Tom's Guide |
| Canonical URL | https://www.tomsguide.com/entertainment/movies/i-just-watched-denzel-washington-and-john-travoltas-action-thriller-remake-and-it-really-goes-off-the-rails |
| Publication time | Sat, 19 Sep 2026 06:30:00 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-09-19T06:33:46.570Z |
| Last seen | 2026-09-19T06:33:46.570Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | 61qLbYPWUsak · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Entertainment Movies I just watched Denzel Washington and John Travolta's action thriller remake and it really goes off the rails Opinion By Malcolm McMillan Published 19 September 2026 'Taking of Pelham 123' features two of the most famous actors of their generation, but I'm not sure it needed either one When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works. (Image credit: Alamy) Copy link Facebook X Reddit Email Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter The Tom's Guide verdict: 'The Taking of Pelham 123' (2009)Rating: 2.5/5 starsVerdict: "The Taking of Pelham 123" is rarely bad. It's also rarely good.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Tom's Guide.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Tom's Guide
