I ran Gemma 4 and Qwen 3.5 for the same local tasks, and one pulled miles ahead
The article compares two local AI models, Gemma 4 and Qwen 3.5, to determine which performs better for specific tasks. Both models have unique features, with Qwen 3.5 offering a hybrid architecture and extended context capabilities, while Gemma 4 focuses on on-device utility. The author shares insights from personal usage, highlighting the strengths of each model in a practical context.
- ▪Qwen 3.5 features a hybrid Gated DeltaNet architecture that allows for handling long contexts efficiently.
- ▪Gemma 4 is designed for on-device utility, providing features like smart replies and summarization.
- ▪Both models fit well into existing workflows, but their performance varies based on specific tasks.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.xda-developers.com/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position":"2", "name": "AI tools", "item": "https://www.xda-developers.com/ai-tools/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position":"3", "name": "I ran Gemma 4 and Qwen 3.5 for the same local tasks, and one pulled miles ahead", "item": "https://www.xda-developers.com/ran-gemma-4-and-qwen-35-for-same-local-tasks-one-pulled-ahead/" } ] } I ran Gemma 4 and Qwen 3.5 for the same local tasks, and one pulled miles ahead By Nolen Jonker Published Jun 3, 2026, 1:00 PM EDT Nolen began their writing career in 2019, with three years dedicated to editing the Creative section at MakeUseOf.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at XDA Developers.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from XDA Developers
