I tested two solar smart locks that never need to be recharged — and there is one clear winner
The next frontier for smart locks is here, with two solar smart locks being tested that never need to be recharged. The Desloc V150 Plus and Lockin Veno Solar offer similar features, but vary in price and design. The Lockin Veno Solar is considered the clear winner due to its lower price and additional features.
- ▪The Desloc V150 Plus has a Kickstarter price starting at $169 and a retail price of $399.99.
- ▪The Lockin Veno Solar is available now and costs $199, or $259.99 with a door handle.
- ▪The Lockin Veno Solar has a face scanner and a palm vein scanner model, both of which are cheaper than the Desloc V150 Plus.
Tom's Guide files mainly under tech. We currently carry 1,452 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Tom's Guide |
| Canonical URL | https://www.tomsguide.com/home/smart-home/i-tested-two-solar-smart-locks-that-never-need-to-be-recharged-and-there-is-one-clear-winner |
| Publication time | Wed, 08 Jul 2026 06:00:00 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-07-08T06:23:00.174Z |
| Last seen | 2026-07-08T06:23:08.849Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | uouq1pOcfy03 |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Home Smart Home I tested two solar smart locks that never need to be recharged — and there is one clear winner Face Off By Christian de Looper Published 8 July 2026 The next frontier for smart locks is here, and here's the one I'd buy When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works. (Image credit: Future) Jump To: Price and availability Specs Design and setup App and smart home Performance Battery life and recharging Verdict Copy link Facebook X Reddit Email Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter The best smart locks have long been a useful tool, but one of the biggest issues hampering their adoption has been battery life.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Tom's Guide.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Tom's Guide
