Is There Actually an Error in the Supreme Court's Analysis in Loper Bright?
Administrative Law Is There Actually an Error in the Supreme Court's Analysis in Loper Bright? Did the Administrative Procedure Act apply in Chevron v. Adler | 7.25.2026 11:42 AM On Thursday, I noted an interesting footnote in Senior Circuit Judge Ray Randolph's dissent in Hospital Menonita de Guayama v.
- ▪Administrative Law Is There Actually an Error in the Supreme Court's Analysis in Loper Bright?
- ▪Did the Administrative Procedure Act apply in Chevron v.
- ▪Adler | 7.25.2026 11:42 AM On Thursday, I noted an interesting footnote in Senior Circuit Judge Ray Randolph's dissent in Hospital Menonita de Guayama v.
Reason Magazine files mainly under politics. We currently carry 442 of its stories.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Administrative Law Is There Actually an Error in the Supreme Court's Analysis in Loper Bright? Did the Administrative Procedure Act apply in Chevron v. NRDC? Jonathan H. Adler | 7.25.2026 11:42 AM On Thursday, I noted an interesting footnote in Senior Circuit Judge Ray Randolph's dissent in Hospital Menonita de Guayama v. NLRB (an interesting decision in its own right), suggesting that the Supreme Court's decision ending Chevron deference in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimando failed to account for the fact that Chevron had not been an APA case, but was rather governed by the judicial review provisions of the Clean Air Act. But is this so? An astute reader pointed me to another footnote--this one from a law review article by Professor John Duffy--suggesting that at the time Chevron v.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Reason.com.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Reason.com
