Jack Smith’s snooping through texts between congressmen may have violated the Constitution’s most important principles
Opinion Jack Smith’s snooping through texts between congressmen may have violated the Constitution’s most important principles By Ari Hoffman Published July 18, 2026, 10:00 a.m. Add The New York Post on Google Was Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of President Trump a “runaway train with no brakes”? Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) as he revealed that Smith obtained text messages to and from 44 lawmakers — including some Democrats — as part of his prosecution of the president.
- ▪Opinion Jack Smith’s snooping through texts between congressmen may have violated the Constitution’s most important principles By Ari Hoffman Published July 18, 2026, 10:00 a.m.
- ▪Add The New York Post on Google Was Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of President Trump a “runaway train with no brakes”?
- ▪Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) as he revealed that Smith obtained text messages to and from 44 lawmakers — including some Democrats — as part of his prosecution of the president.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Opinion Jack Smith’s snooping through texts between congressmen may have violated the Constitution’s most important principles By Ari Hoffman Published July 18, 2026, 10:00 a.m. ET (function() { var overlay = document.getElementById("nyp-player-lcp-overlay"); if (!overlay) { return; } function hideOverlay() { overlay.remove(); } function afterDCL() { requestAnimationFrame(hideOverlay); } if (document.readyState === "loading") { document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", afterDCL, { once: true }); } else { afterDCL(); } })(); See more of our coverage in your search results. Add The New York Post on Google Was Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of President Trump a “runaway train with no brakes”? That’s the phrase used by Sen.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from New York Post
