John Burn-Murdoch on phones and fertility
John Burn-Murdoch discusses the relationship between smartphones and fertility rates. He argues that social media acts as a technological shock that accelerates cultural changes affecting fertility. The article also highlights the importance of both birth rates and child survival rates in understanding fertility trends.
- ▪John Burn-Murdoch suggests that smartphones and social media amplify existing cultural changes impacting fertility.
- ▪He compares the influence of social media on fertility to the effect of GLP-1s on weight loss.
- ▪The discussion emphasizes that both the number of births and the survival of children are significant factors in fertility rates.
Marginal Revolution files mainly under finance. We currently carry 105 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | Marginal Revolution |
| Canonical URL | https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2026/05/john-burn-murdoch-on-phones-and-fertility.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=john-burn-murdoch-on-phones-and-fertility |
| Publication time | Wed, 20 May 2026 05:46:37 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-05-20T05:55:00.268Z |
| Last seen | 2026-05-20T05:55:00.268Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | ucKw5LBe_gPE |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
John Burn-Murdoch on phones and fertility by Tyler Cowen May 20, 2026 at 1:46 am in Web/Tech From my email: Hi folks, appreciate the discussion of the piece here, as ever. I just wanted to chime in briefly with an analogy that speaks to one of the ways I think about the causal mechanism here, and to my mind pushes back against the argument that since past declines in fertility didn’t come from smartphones etc the current decline can’t either. • In the past, weight loss generally came from sustained dieting and exercise • Now it overwhelmingly comes from injecting GLP-1s • In the same way that GLP-1s are a technological shock that amplifies/accelerates the old mechanism (eating less), social media is a technological shock that amplifies/accelerates the old mechanism (cultural…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Marginal Revolution.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Marginal Revolution
