WeSearch

JONATHAN TURLEY: Comey’s shell post may be crass, but charging him is a free speech trap

·8 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 3 views
#free speech#first amendment#james comey#donald trump#supreme court
JONATHAN TURLEY: Comey’s shell post may be crass, but charging him is a free speech trap
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted over a social media post featuring the numbers '86 47' arranged in shells on a beach, which some interpreted as a threat against President Donald Trump. Legal scholar Jonathan Turley argues the charges are likely unconstitutional, as the post constitutes crude political speech protected by the First Amendment. He contends that without evidence Comey intended a genuine threat, the prosecution faces a high legal bar under Supreme Court precedent. While the post may be distasteful, Turley maintains that such speech must be protected to preserve free expression.

Key facts
Original article
Fox News
Read full at Fox News →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Opinion JONATHAN TURLEY: Comey’s shell post may be crass, but charging him is a free speech trap The '86 47' shell image was crude political speech, not a true threat under Supreme Court precedent By Jonathan Turley Fox News Published April 28, 2026 7:53pm EDT | Updated April 28, 2026 7:55pm EDT Facebook Twitter Threads Flipboard Comments Print Email Add Fox News on Google close Video James Comey indicted over ‘86 47’ social media post, accused of threats against Trump Fox News correspondent David Spunt reports on the Justice Department’s charges against former FBI Director James Comey over an ‘86 47’ social media post allegedly threatening President Donald Trump on ‘Special Report.’ NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! In the last year, coverage of former FBI Director James Comey…

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Fox News.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Fox News