JONATHAN TURLEY: Comey’s shell post may be crass, but charging him is a free speech trap
Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted over a social media post featuring the numbers '86 47' arranged in shells on a beach, which some interpreted as a threat against former President Donald Trump. Legal experts, including longtime Comey critic Jonathan Turley, argue the charges may violate First Amendment protections for political speech. The case hinges on whether the image constitutes a 'true threat' under federal law, a standard the Supreme Court has narrowly defined.
- ▪James Comey was indicted over a social media post showing the numbers '86 47' made from shells on a beach.
- ▪Comey claims he did not create the shell art but merely shared it with his followers on X.
- ▪Legal analysts argue the indictment may be unconstitutional because the post likely does not meet the legal definition of a 'true threat.'
- ▪The case is being prosecuted in North Carolina, where the shell image was reportedly found.
- ▪Turley, a longtime critic of Comey, contends the charges set a dangerous precedent for free speech.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Opinion JONATHAN TURLEY: Comey’s shell post may be crass, but charging him is a free speech trap The '86 47' shell image was crude political speech, not a true threat under Supreme Court precedent By Jonathan Turley Fox News Published April 28, 2026 7:53pm EDT | Updated April 28, 2026 7:55pm EDT Facebook Twitter Threads Flipboard Comments Print Email Add Fox News on Google close Video James Comey indicted over ‘86 47’ social media post, accused of threats against Trump Fox News correspondent David Spunt reports on the Justice Department’s charges against former FBI Director James Comey over an ‘86 47’ social media post allegedly threatening President Donald Trump on ‘Special Report.’ NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! In the last year, coverage of former FBI Director James Comey…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Fox News — Latest.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Fox News — Latest
