Judge Nukes Trump DOJ’s “Vindictive” Prosecution (w/ Mary McCord)
A federal judge has criticized the Department of Justice's prosecution tactics related to former President Trump. The discussion highlights various legal controversies, including a secret fund for January 6 defendants and misconduct in grand jury proceedings. The episode raises concerns about the integrity of DOJ lawyers and their alignment with political agendas.
- ▪A federal judge exposed misconduct in the grand jury process related to the Broadview Six case.
- ▪There is growing distrust among judges regarding the actions of DOJ lawyers.
- ▪The Trump administration's DOJ has been accused of acting more like political operatives than impartial legal authorities.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Playback speed×Share postShare post at current timeShare from 0:000:00/PreviewJudge Nukes Trump DOJ’s “Vindictive” Prosecution (w/ Mary McCord)Sarah LongwellMay 27, 2026∙ PaidShareSarah Longwell welcomes Mary McCord—former DOJ prosecutor and co-host of the Main Justice podcast—to discuss a series of jaw-dropping legal scandals surrounding Trump’s Justice Department. They include the secretive $1.776 billion “slush fund” for January 6 defendants, a federal judge exposing shocking grand jury misconduct in the Broadview Six case, the collapse of the Kilmar Abrego Garcia prosecution, growing judicial distrust of DOJ lawyers, and what happens when prosecutors start acting like political operatives instead of officers of the court.Listen to Main Justice on Apple Podcasts: Leave a commentShow…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Bulwark.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Bulwark
