
Law professor Orin Kerr on criminal liability for AI hacking
Orin Kerr@OrinKerrA lot of people replied to this tweet by saying that I'm just wrong about criminal law: We *do* normally make it a crime to commit tort law negligence, as shown by statutes like negligent homicide. First, it's true that there are exceptions to the ordinary rule that negligent acts are not made criminal—most prominently, negligent homicide. But the word "negligence" is generally used in criminal laws like negligent homicide statutes differently than it is used in tort law.
- ▪Orin Kerr@OrinKerrA lot of people replied to this tweet by saying that I'm just wrong about criminal law: We *do* normally make it a crime to commit tort law negligence, as shown by statutes like negligent homicide.
- ▪First, it's true that there are exceptions to the ordinary rule that negligent acts are not made criminal—most prominently, negligent homicide.
- ▪But the word "negligence" is generally used in criminal laws like negligent homicide statutes differently than it is used in tort law.
Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 6,775 of its stories.
Story provenance
Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →
Story provenance
Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.
Record
| Original publisher | X (formerly Twitter) |
| Canonical URL | https://twitter.com/OrinKerr/status/2104271670697755016 |
| Publication time | Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:43:51 +0000 |
| Retrieval time | 2026-09-28T19:10:14.795Z |
| Last seen | 2026-09-28T19:10:14.795Z |
| Headline source | Publisher (no WeSearch rewrite) |
| Excerpt source | publisher body |
| Excerpt method | First ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited. |
| Summary | WeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer) |
| Summary source text | contentText |
| Citation coverage | Summary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL. |
| Cluster | jT8kYUclMW6M · 1 stories |
| Cluster logic | Grouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison. |
| Ranking reason | Story pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking. |
| Publisher visit | Yes — open original |
| Substitutes article? | No — link-out required for full text |
Rights status (four layers)
WeSearch handling by dimension
| Indexing | May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? | Allowed |
| Snippet | May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? | Allowed |
| AI summary | May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? | Limited |
| Retrieval / RAG | May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? | Not asserted |
| Model training | May the content be used to train AI models? | Not asserted |
| Commercial reuse | May the content be reused commercially? | Not permitted |
Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Orin Kerr@OrinKerrA lot of people replied to this tweet by saying that I'm just wrong about criminal law: We *do* normally make it a crime to commit tort law negligence, as shown by statutes like negligent homicide. Two thoughts. First, it's true that there are exceptions to the ordinary rule that negligent acts are not made criminal—most prominently, negligent homicide. But the word "negligence" is generally used in criminal laws like negligent homicide statutes differently than it is used in tort law. "Negligence" is not tort negligence; it's a higher standard more like gross negligence. See e.g. People v. Penny, 285 P.2d 926 (Cal. 1955).
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at X (formerly Twitter).