WeSearch

Layman with no degree directs AI agents to derive Newton's G to 1.86 ppm

·3 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 29 views
#ai#physics#research#gravity#innovation
Layman with no degree directs AI agents to derive Newton's G to 1.86 ppm
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

A layperson has directed AI agents to derive a closed-form expression for Newton's gravitational constant G, achieving a match to within 1.86 parts per million. This research involved an exhaustive search of 2.67 billion expressions, resulting in a unique formula that has passed various tests for accuracy. The work demonstrates the potential for non-experts to engage in complex scientific inquiries with the assistance of advanced AI technologies.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 2,831 of its stories.

Original article
GitHub
Read full at GitHub →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherGitHub
Canonical URLhttps://github.com/oldrich-research/gravitational-constant-relation
Publication timeSun, 24 May 2026 20:41:31 +0000
Retrieval time2026-05-24T20:57:34.489Z
Last seen2026-05-24T20:57:34.489Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
Cluster-lQlxn48eM9h
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

A High-Precision Phenomenological Relation for Newton's Constant A single closed-form expression that reproduces Newton's gravitational constant G from the electron mass, the reduced Planck constant, the speed of light, and the fine-structure constant alone: G = (4/3) · (ℏ c / m_e²) · α²¹ · exp(−5α/2) Evaluated at CODATA 2022, this matches the measured value of G to within the 2.2 × 10⁻⁵ relative uncertainty of the CODATA value itself. The relation was discovered by an exhaustive bounded equation search through 2.67 billion raw expressions yielding 777,191 canonical-unique survivors at enumeration cost cap C=21 (jl15 engine, completed 2026-05-20), and survived a battery of sham-parity, swap, and family-classification tests designed to rule out numerical accidents.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at GitHub.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from GitHub