WeSearch

Lightweight, zero-dependency prompt that prevents AI agents from losing context

262588213843476· ·11 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 1 view
#lightweight#zero-dependency#prompt#prevents#agents
Lightweight, zero-dependency prompt that prevents AI agents from losing context
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

The append-only design log A prompting convention for working with coding agents over many sessions. The trick, in a paragraph Ask the agent to keep a design-and-work log, and make it append-only: numbered dated sections, never edited, later ones superseding earlier ones by citation. Require every section to end with a list of what was not done.

Key facts
About this source

Hacker News (AI / LLM) files mainly under ai. We currently carry 2,813 of its stories.

Original article
Gist · 262588213843476
Read full at Gist →

Story provenance

Source · retrieval · rights · ranking — open for full record
inspect →

Attribution is not the same as permission. This drawer separates discovery metadata, excerpts, WeSearch-generated summaries, reuse status, and whether the publisher receives the visit. Nothing here claims a legal grant the publisher has not made.

Record

Original publisherGist
Canonical URLhttps://gist.github.com/sourdecor/78b2ff9016f3f597934150a3501427ff
Publication timeWed, 29 Jul 2026 18:57:27 +0000
Retrieval time2026-07-29T19:25:58.483Z
Last seen2026-07-29T19:25:58.483Z
Headline sourcePublisher (no WeSearch rewrite)
Excerpt sourcepublisher body
Excerpt methodFirst ~120 words (~800 chars) of extracted publisher body, fair-use limited.
SummaryWeSearch · cerebras-chat (WeSearch summarizer)
Summary source textcontentText
Citation coverageSummary is a WeSearch-generated derivative; primary citation is the original publisher URL.
ClusterOO46v_kFcJlj · 1 stories
Cluster logicGrouped by semantic title/content similarity across sources within a rolling window. Same-publisher template collisions are excluded from coverage comparison.
Ranking reasonStory pages are not engagement-ranked. Hub feeds use recency, with optional source-diversified chronological ordering (cap consecutive stories per source). No personalized ranking.
Publisher visitYes — open original
Substitutes article?No — link-out required for full text

Rights status (four layers)

Publisher-declared
No publisher-confirmed rights record for this source yet.
Machine-readable
No source-specific machine-readable restriction detected beyond the public feed.
WeSearch interpretation
WeSearch declared handling (basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed). This is WeSearch policy, not a legal grant on the publisher's behalf.
Unknown
Retrieval and training permissions are not asserted unless the publisher confirms them.

WeSearch handling by dimension

Indexing May the item be indexed (stored, ranked, made findable)? Allowed
Snippet May a short excerpt of the publisher's text be shown? Allowed
AI summary May WeSearch generate its own short summary of the article? Limited
Retrieval / RAG May the content be exposed for third-party retrieval-augmented generation? Not asserted
Model training May the content be used to train AI models? Not asserted
Commercial reuse May the content be reused commercially? Not permitted

Basis: Derived from the published RSS/Atom feed. Contact: [email protected]. Reviewed: 2026-07-24.

Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

The append-only design log A prompting convention for working with coding agents over many sessions. The trick, in a paragraph Ask the agent to keep a design-and-work log, and make it append-only: numbered dated sections, never edited, later ones superseding earlier ones by citation. Require every section to end with a list of what was not done. Then state that convention in the file the agent loads on every session. What you get is a document that keeps its own refutations. When a belief turns out to be wrong, the wrong belief stays on the page and a new section says so by number — so a fresh session with no context can't reintroduce the mistake as an improvement, which is exactly what it would otherwise do whenever the refuted design is the more principled-looking one.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Gist.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Gist